Try TBH inside ChatGPT. Click here
Back To Blog
Kolaru Gideon Mosimiloluwa
TBH vs. Screenloop: Which Should You Buy?
Updated: Fri, Feb 28, 2025
Kolaru Gideon MosimiloluwaChoosing the right hiring tool can be a game-changer for your recruitment process. If you’re comparing TBH and Screenloop, you’re likely looking for a solution that enhances interview feedback, reduces bias, and improves candidate experience. But which one fits your needs better?
In this article, we’ll break down their features, pricing, and benefits so you can make an informed decision. If you’re exploring more AI-powered hiring tools, check out our comparison of BrightHire vs. TBH or our deep dive into top AI-driven recruitment solutions.
Let’s dive into the details and see how TBH and Screenloop stack up.
What is Screenloop?
Screenloop is an AI-powered hiring tool that helps organizations optimize their recruitment process by offering real-time interview intelligence, automated feedback, and analytics-driven decision-making. The platform aims to eliminate hiring bias and improve candidate experience through structured assessments and insights.
Key Features of Screenloop
- Application Tracking System: ScreenLoop goes beyond traditional applicant tracking by offering a modern, AI-powered ATS that centralizes candidate data, streamlines workflows, and ensures seamless integration with existing tools. This feature helps recruiters manage high-volume hiring efficiently while maintaining a structured and organized process.
- Interview Intelligence: ScreenLoop’s AI-powered interview notes ensure that every interaction counts. By automatically generating detailed notes and insights from interviews, ScreenLoop reduces manual effort, minimizes bias, and helps hiring teams make data-driven decisions.
- Pulse: With automated surveys, ScreenLoop allows recruiters to collect feedback from candidates, interviewers, and hiring managers effortlessly. This feature provides valuable insights into the hiring process, helping organizations identify areas for improvement and enhance the overall candidate experience.
- References: ScreenLoop enables recruiters to validate candidates with employer and peer insights. By automating reference checks, this feature ensures that hiring teams have access to reliable, comprehensive information about candidates, reducing the risk of bad hires.
- Background Checks: ScreenLoop offers fast, compliant background screenings to help organizations make smarter hiring decisions. This feature ensures that all necessary checks are completed quickly and in compliance with legal requirements, reducing delays in the hiring process.
- Interviewer Training: ScreenLoop helps elevate the skills of interviewers with customizable training modules. These modules cover best practices for conducting interviews, reducing bias, and making fair, informed decisions, ensuring a consistent and professional hiring process.
Who Should Use Screenloop?
- HR Teams and Recruiters: Helps streamline interview processes and improve decision-making.
- Hiring Managers: Ensures consistent and structured evaluations across all candidates.
- Large Enterprises: Supports high-volume hiring while maintaining quality and compliance.
- Diversity and Inclusion Advocates: Provides tools to minimize bias and create an equitable hiring process.
What is TBH?
TBH is an innovative hiring tool designed to streamline the interview feedback process, ensuring that hiring teams never miss out on top talent due to delayed responses. By enabling interviewers to share their thoughts and impressions on candidates effortlessly. TBH enhances recruitment efficiency, improves candidate experience, and fosters better collaboration between hiring managers and recruiters.
At its core, TBH humanizes recruitment, making the feedback process more natural and actionable while eliminating common hiring bottlenecks. Whether it’s reducing procrastination in providing feedback, improving employer branding through transparency, or helping candidates understand their strengths and areas for growth, TBH transforms how organizations manage recruitment insights.
Key Features of TBH
- Pre-Built Scorecards: Forget the hassle of creating feedback forms from scratch. TBH provides pre-built, customizable scorecards that hiring teams can use to quickly evaluate candidates. These templates ensure structured and consistent feedback, making it easier to assess candidates fairly.
- Collect Feedback in Natural Language: Interviewers can share feedback effortlessly using their voice. Instead of typing out long responses, they can speak naturally, allowing TBH to capture authentic and detailed impressions. This feature speeds up the process and encourages interviewers to provide more honest and insightful evaluations.
- Instant Hire/No-Hire Recommendations: TBH automatically analyzes and summarizes collected feedback, generating a collective decision from the hiring team. This eliminates lengthy deliberations and ensures faster hiring decisions based on comprehensive insights.
- Actionable Feedback for Candidates: No more leaving candidates in the dark. TBH enables hiring teams to send prompt, structured feedback that is clear, constructive, and actionable. This helps candidates understand where they stand and how they can improve, enhancing their overall experience.
- Enhanced Collaboration Between Hiring Teams: TBH fosters better communication between recruiters, hiring managers, and interviewers. With a centralized feedback system, teams stay aligned on candidate evaluations, making hiring decisions more cohesive and strategic.
- Comprehensive Candidate Insights: By analyzing feedback trends over time, TBH helps organizations refine their hiring criteria and gain deeper insights into what makes an ideal candidate. This data-driven approach improves long-term hiring strategies.
- Improved Employer Branding: Transparency in the hiring process enhances a company’s reputation. TBH ensures that candidates receive timely updates and respectful feedback, showcasing your organization’s commitment to a fair and professional recruitment experience.
Who Should Use TBH?
- Recruiters and Hiring Managers: Simplifies feedback collection and enhances decision-making.
- Organizations Focused on Candidate Experience: Ensures candidates receive timely and constructive feedback.
- Companies Looking to Reduce Bias: Helps teams make more objective hiring decisions through structured evaluations.
- Fast-Growing Startups: Allows lean teams to optimize their hiring process efficiently.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison: ScreenLoop vs. TBH
When it comes to modern HR tools designed to streamline the recruitment process, ScreenLoop and TBH stand out as two compelling options. Both platforms aim to improve hiring efficiency, collaboration, and candidate experience, but they approach these goals in distinct ways. Below, we break down their features in detail to help you understand which tool might be the best fit for your organization.
1. Feedback Collection
- ScreenLoop:ScreenLoop focuses on structured feedback collection through customizable scorecards and evaluation frameworks. Interviewers provide written feedback based on predefined criteria, ensuring consistency and reducing bias. This approach is ideal for organizations that prioritize standardized evaluations.
- Pros: Structured, consistent, and easy to analyze.
- Cons: May feel rigid or impersonal to interviewers who prefer more flexibility.
- TBH:TBH takes a more humanized approach by allowing interviewers to share feedback in their own words using voice-based input. This makes the process faster and more authentic, capturing nuanced insights that written feedback might miss.
- Pros: Authentic, detailed, and engaging for interviewers.
- Cons: May require additional effort to analyze unstructured voice feedback.
Verdict: If you value structured, data-driven feedback, ScreenLoop is the better choice. If you want to humanize the process and capture richer insights, TBH excels.
2. Interview Management
- ScreenLoop:ScreenLoop offers robust interview management features, including scheduling tools, interview recording, and collaboration capabilities. It integrates with ATS systems to streamline workflows and ensure all hiring stakeholders are aligned.
- Pros: Comprehensive and integrates well with existing tools.
- Cons: May feel overly complex for smaller teams or simpler hiring processes.
- TBH:TBH focuses less on scheduling and more on improving the feedback and decision-making process. While it doesn’t offer advanced interview management features, it ensures that feedback is collected and acted upon quickly.
- Pros: Lightweight and easy to use.
- Cons: Lacks advanced scheduling or ATS integration features.
Verdict: For end-to-end interview management, ScreenLoop is the stronger option. If you already have a scheduling system in place and just need a feedback tool, TBH is sufficient.
3. Candidate Experience
- ScreenLoop:ScreenLoop provides tools to keep candidates informed about their application status and next steps. However, its focus is more on internal efficiency than on delivering a standout candidate experience.
- Pros: Keeps candidates updated within the hiring workflow.
- Cons: Less emphasis on personalized or actionable feedback for candidates.
- TBH:TBH shines in this area by providing ready-to-send follow-up emails with clear, actionable feedback. This eliminates ghosting and ensures candidates feel respected and valued, even if they aren’t selected.
- Pros: Enhances employer branding and candidate satisfaction.
- Cons: Requires additional effort to ensure feedback is constructive and professional.
Verdict: If candidate experience is a top priority, TBH is the clear winner.
4. Collaboration and Decision-Making
- ScreenLoop:ScreenLoop facilitates collaboration by centralizing feedback and evaluations in one place. Hiring teams can review scorecards, compare notes, and make data-driven decisions.
- Pros: Promotes alignment and reduces miscommunication.
- Cons: May feel impersonal due to its structured approach.
- TBH:TBH fosters collaboration by summarizing feedback and providing instant hire/no-hire recommendations based on the hiring team’s input. Its voice-based feedback also encourages more open and authentic communication among team members.
- Pros: Encourages genuine dialogue and faster decision-making.
- Cons: Less structured, which could lead to subjective evaluations.
Verdict: For structured collaboration, ScreenLoop is better. For a more human and fast-paced approach, TBH takes the lead.
5. Analytics and Insights
- ScreenLoop:ScreenLoop offers detailed analytics and reporting features, helping organizations identify bottlenecks, track hiring metrics, and refine their recruitment strategies over time.
- Pros: Data-rich and actionable insights.
- Cons: May require a learning curve to interpret the data effectively.
- TBH:TBH provides insights into feedback trends, helping organizations understand what makes an ideal candidate. However, its analytics are less comprehensive compared to ScreenLoop.
- Pros: Easy to understand and focused on qualitative insights.
- Cons: Lacks advanced reporting capabilities.
Verdict: If you need deep analytics, ScreenLoop is the better choice. For simpler, trend-based insights, TBH is sufficient.
6. Ease of Use
- ScreenLoop:ScreenLoop is feature-rich but may feel overwhelming for smaller teams or those new to HR tech. Its structured approach requires some setup and training.
- Pros: Powerful and customizable.
- Cons: Steeper learning curve.
- TBH:TBH is designed to be intuitive and user-friendly, with a focus on simplicity and speed. Its voice-based feedback feature is particularly easy to adopt.
- Pros: Lightweight and easy to implement.
- Cons: May lack advanced features for complex hiring needs.
Verdict: For ease of use, TBH is the winner.
7. Voice-Enabled Feedback Collection
- ScreenLoop:ScreenLoop does not currently offer voice-enabled feedback collection. It relies on written feedback through structured forms and scorecards.
- Pros: Ensures consistency and reduces bias.
- Cons: May feel less engaging for interviewers who prefer speaking over writing.
- TBH:TBH’s standout feature is its voice-enabled feedback collection, which allows interviewers to share their thoughts verbally. This makes the process faster and more natural, capturing richer insights.
- Pros: Authentic, detailed, and engaging for interviewers.
- Cons: May require additional effort to analyze unstructured voice feedback.
Verdict: If voice-enabled feedback is a priority, TBH is the clear choice.
8. ATS Integration
- ScreenLoop:ScreenLoop offers robust ATS integration, allowing seamless synchronization with popular Applicant Tracking Systems. This ensures that all candidate data and feedback are centralized, streamlining the hiring workflow.
- Pros: Comprehensive integration with existing tools.
- Cons: May require technical setup and configuration.
- TBH:TBH currently does not offer full ATS integration, but the team is actively working on enabling seamless integration with popular ATS platforms. Users can request priority for their preferred ATS.
- Pros: Lightweight and easy to use without complex integrations.
- Cons: Lack of ATS integration may limit functionality for some teams.
Verdict: If ATS integration is critical, ScreenLoop is the better option. If you can wait for future updates or don’t need ATS integration immediately, TBH is still a strong contender.
9. Scalability for High-Volume Hiring
- ScreenLoop:ScreenLoop is designed to handle high-volume hiring with its structured feedback system and robust analytics. It’s ideal for large organizations or those with complex hiring needs.
- Pros: Scalable and data-driven.
- Cons: May feel overwhelming for smaller teams.
- TBH:TBH is designed for fast-paced hiring teams, making it ideal for companies that need to process a high volume of candidates quickly. Its voice-enabled feedback and instant recommendations streamline the process.
- Pros: Fast and efficient for high-volume hiring.
- Cons: Less structured, which may not suit all organizations.
Verdict: For scalability in high-volume hiring, both tools are strong, but TBH’s speed and simplicity give it an edge for fast-paced environments.
10. Speed and Efficiency of Feedback
- ScreenLoop:ScreenLoop automates parts of the feedback process, such as note-taking and scorecard generation, but still relies on structured scorecards and manual input. This can sometimes slow down immediate responses, especially if interviewers delay filling out forms.
- Pros: Structured and consistent, with some automation to reduce workload.
- Cons: May not be as fast as voice-based or free-form feedback systems.
- TBH:TBH is designed to eliminate procrastination by enabling interviewers to provide instant voice-based feedback. This reduces delays in hiring decisions and keeps the process moving quickly.
- Pros: Faster feedback collection, ideal for fast-paced hiring environments.
- Cons: Less structured, which may require additional effort to standardize feedback.
Verdict: For speed and efficiency, TBH is the stronger option, especially for teams that need quick turnaround times.
11. Automation and AI Integration
- ScreenLoop:ScreenLoop deeply integrates AI into its platform, automating tasks like reference checks, note-taking, and interview analysis. This improves hiring efficiency and reduces manual workload.
- Pros: Comprehensive automation for a streamlined hiring process.
- Cons: May feel overly automated for teams that prefer a human touch.
- TBH:TBH uses AI to analyze feedback trends over time and automatically generate recommendations. However, its primary strength lies in humanizing feedback collection through voice and natural language input.
- Pros: Balances automation with a human-centric approach.
- Cons: Less emphasis on automating other aspects of the hiring process.
Verdict: If you want deep automation across the hiring process, ScreenLoop is the better choice. If you prefer a humanized approach with some AI support, TBH is ideal.
12. Scalability and Customization
- ScreenLoop:ScreenLoop offers pre-built hiring workflows that can be adapted as organizations grow. This makes it well-suited for scaling recruitment efforts, especially for larger teams.
- Pros: Scalable and customizable for complex hiring needs.
- Cons: May require more setup and training for smaller teams.
- TBH:TBH provides editable feedback forms and customizable scorecards, ensuring that companies can tailor feedback to their specific needs. It’s lightweight and easy to implement, making it ideal for teams of all sizes.
- Pros: Flexible and easy to customize.
- Cons: May lack some advanced features needed for large-scale hiring.
Verdict: For scalability in large organizations, ScreenLoop is better. For flexibility and ease of use, TBH is the stronger option.
Pricing
ScreenLoop
ScreenLoop’s pricing is tailored to enterprise needs, with custom quotes based on the size of the organization and specific requirements. It’s ideal for larger teams with complex hiring processes.
- Pros: Customizable to fit enterprise needs.
- Cons: May be cost-prohibitive for smaller teams.
TBH
TBH offers a more flexible pricing model, making it accessible for smaller teams and startups. Pricing details are available upon request, and the tool is designed to provide value without breaking the bank.
- Pros: Affordable and scalable for teams of all sizes.
- Cons: May lack some advanced features found in enterprise-grade tools.
Verdict: If budget is a concern, TBH is the more affordable option. For enterprise-grade features, ScreenLoop is worth the investment.
Final Thoughts
Both ScreenLoop and TBH offer unique strengths, and the right choice depends on your organization’s priorities:
- Choose ScreenLoop if you need a comprehensive, data-driven tool with advanced interview management, ATS integration, and deep analytics.
- Choose TBH if you want to humanize the recruitment process, improve candidate experience, and streamline feedback collection with a lightweight, easy-to-use tool.
By understanding the specific features and strengths of each platform, you can make an informed decision that aligns with your hiring goals and team dynamics.
Table of Contents
Featured Podcast
Improve candidate experience in 7 minutes. Listen now.
Loading audio...
FAQs
More information about this topic