Try TBH inside ChatGPT. Click here
Written vs. Verbal Feedback: Impact on Decision Quality and Speed
Updated: Fri, May 9, 2025
Kolaru Gideon Mosimiloluwa
The method through which feedback is collected can significantly influence both the quality of hiring decisions and the speed at which they're made. Feedback sits at the heart of effective recruitment, yet many organizations still struggle with optimizing this crucial process. This article explores the comparative impact of written versus verbal feedback approaches on decision quality and speed in the recruitment context.
The Current State of Feedback in Recruitment
Feedback collection remains one of the most challenging aspects of the hiring process. Interviewers often delay providing feedback, creating bottlenecks that slow down the entire recruitment pipeline. According to a 2023 Talent Board study, 73% of candidates wait more than a week to receive feedback after interviews, with 28% never hearing back at all. This delay doesn't just affect candidates; it impacts the quality of hiring decisions and extends time-to-hire metrics.
The traditional recruitment feedback loop typically involves written assessments completed by interviewers, which are then collected, analyzed, and synthesized by recruiters before decisions are communicated to candidates. This process, while structured, often introduces significant delays and can filter out valuable nuances that might influence hiring decisions.
Written Feedback: Strengths and Limitations
Strengths of Written Feedback
- Documentation and Record-Keeping: Written feedback creates a permanent record that can be referenced throughout the hiring process and beyond.
- Structured Assessment: Standardized forms enable consistent evaluation across different interviewers and candidates.
- Time for Reflection: Interviewers can take time to consider their thoughts and articulate them carefully.
- Reduced Recency Bias: Written feedback often requires interviewers to assess multiple dimensions, potentially reducing the impact of the "last impression."
- Easily Shareable: Written feedback can be easily distributed to all stakeholders in the hiring process.
Limitations of Written Feedback
- Procrastination Factor: Interviewers often delay completing written feedback forms, creating bottlenecks in the decision-making process.
- Cognitive Load: Writing comprehensive feedback requires significant cognitive effort, which can lead to shortcuts or superficial assessments.
- Limited Expressiveness: The nuances of an interviewer's impression may not translate well to written format.
- Time-Consuming: Crafting thoughtful written feedback takes considerable time, which busy hiring managers may not have.
- Reduced Authenticity: The formality of written feedback can sometimes lead to sanitized responses that don't capture genuine reactions.
Verbal Feedback: Strengths and Limitations
Strengths of Verbal Feedback
- Immediacy: Verbal feedback can be captured immediately after an interview while impressions are fresh.
- Richness of Information: Tone, emphasis, and natural language provide additional layers of meaning beyond the words themselves.
- Reduced Administrative Burden: Speaking is generally faster and requires less effort than writing for most people.
- Higher Completion Rates: The lower barrier to providing verbal feedback typically results in more interviewers actually completing their assessments.
- Authentic Impressions: Verbal feedback often captures more genuine, unfiltered impressions.
Limitations of Verbal Feedback
- Potential for Disorganization: Without structure, verbal feedback may lack focus or fail to address key evaluation criteria.
- Documentation Challenges: Traditionally, verbal feedback needed to be transcribed or otherwise captured for record-keeping.
- Inconsistency: Without prompts, different interviewers might focus on entirely different aspects of a candidate.
- Recall Difficulties: If not recorded immediately, verbal feedback relies on memory, which can be fallible.
- Potential for Tangents: Verbal feedback can sometimes wander off-topic without the constraints of a written form.
Impact on Decision Quality
How Written Feedback Affects Decision Quality
Written feedback tends to support more methodical decision-making. The process of writing forces interviewers to organize their thoughts and provide evidence for their assessments. This structured approach can lead to more consistent evaluations across candidates.
However, research from the Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology suggests that the delay between interview and feedback submission—common with written assessments—can reduce the accuracy of evaluations. A 2022 study found that interviewers who waited more than 24 hours to document their impressions showed a 31% reduction in the predictive validity of their assessments.
How Verbal Feedback Affects Decision Quality
Verbal feedback captures immediate impressions, which can be particularly valuable for assessing qualities like cultural fit, communication skills, and interpersonal dynamics. The richness of verbal communication—including tone, emphasis, and natural language—provides context that might be lost in written form.
A Stanford University study on decision-making found that teams who shared verbal feedback made more accurate hiring predictions than those who relied solely on written assessments, with a 23% improvement in performance prediction accuracy.
Impact on Decision Speed
How Written Feedback Affects Decision Speed
The traditional written feedback process introduces several delays:
- Completion Delay: Interviewers take an average of 3.7 days to complete written feedback forms.
- Collection Delay: Recruiting teams spend additional time following up and collecting all required forms.
- Analysis Delay: Synthesizing written feedback from multiple sources takes time and effort.
According to SHRM data, companies using exclusively written feedback systems experience an average time-to-decision that's 5.4 days longer than those with more flexible feedback collection methods.
How Verbal Feedback Affects Decision Speed
Verbal feedback can dramatically accelerate the decision-making process:
- Immediate Capture: Verbal feedback can be provided immediately after an interview.
- Reduced Administrative Burden: The ease of speaking versus writing reduces procrastination.
- Faster Synthesis: Modern tools can quickly process and analyze verbal feedback.
Organizations implementing verbal feedback systems report up to 42% reduction in time-to-decision, according to a 2023 Deloitte talent acquisition study.
Optimizing the Feedback Process: A Hybrid Approach
Most successful talent acquisition teams now recognize that the written-versus-verbal feedback question isn't an either/or proposition. The most effective approach combines elements of both:
- Structured Verbal Feedback: Using guided questions to ensure comprehensive coverage while allowing the natural flow of verbal communication.
- Automated Transcription and Analysis: Leveraging technology to convert verbal feedback into searchable, analyzable text.
- Immediate Capture with Thoughtful Review: Collecting immediate verbal impressions followed by a brief period for reflection and additional insights.
- Standardized Rating Scales: Combining qualitative verbal feedback with quantitative assessments for balanced evaluation.
- Collaborative Decision-Making: Using technology to facilitate rapid sharing of insights among hiring team members.
The Role of Technology in Modernizing Feedback
The traditional limitations of verbal feedback—primarily around documentation and structure—have been largely overcome through technological innovation. Modern AI-powered tools now enable:
- Voice-to-Text Conversion: Automatically transcribing verbal feedback into written form.
- Natural Language Processing: Analyzing verbal feedback for sentiment, key themes, and evaluation patterns.
- Structured Verbal Assessments: Guiding interviewers through key evaluation areas while allowing natural expression.
- Immediate Sharing: Distributing feedback insights to all stakeholders instantly.
- Bias Detection: Identifying potential unconscious biases in both written and verbal feedback.
Best Practices for Implementing Verbal Feedback Systems
Organizations looking to harness the speed and richness of verbal feedback should consider:
- Designing Clear Prompts: Create specific questions that guide interviewers to cover all necessary evaluation areas.
- Training Interviewers: Ensure team members understand how to provide comprehensive verbal assessments.
- Establishing Consistency: Develop standard evaluation criteria regardless of feedback method.
- Ensuring Privacy: Create secure channels for honest verbal feedback.
- Maintaining Accessibility: Ensure that feedback systems accommodate diverse needs and preferences.
The Impact on Candidate Experience
The feedback method doesn't just affect internal decision-making—it also significantly impacts candidate experience:
- Faster Decisions: Candidates consistently rank "speed of process" among their top considerations in evaluating potential employers.
- More Authentic Feedback: Candidates who receive feedback that feels genuine and specific report 67% higher satisfaction with the recruitment process.
- Improved Communication: Faster internal feedback loops enable more timely and informative candidate communications.
According to a LinkedIn Talent Solutions survey, companies that provide prompt, specific feedback to candidates are 4x more likely to have candidates apply again in the future or refer others.
Let’s Talk About TBH
TBH is an AI-powered interview feedback tool designed to humanize recruitment by making feedback easy to share, both from interviewers and to candidates. This innovative solution addresses the challenges of traditional feedback methods by combining the best aspects of both written and verbal approaches.
How TBH Transforms the Feedback Process
TBH empowers interviewers to express their thoughts in their own words, making feedback more authentic and detailed without the hassle of writing. This approach eliminates procrastination by reducing delays in feedback with a tool that encourages immediate responses.
The platform enables faster candidate updates, keeping applicants informed about their status promptly, enhancing their experience and your employer brand. By providing candidates with clear, constructive feedback, TBH ensures they receive actionable insights they can use to improve and grow.
Additionally, TBH fosters enhanced collaboration between recruiters and hiring managers, ensuring everyone is aligned on candidate evaluations. The tool provides comprehensive candidate insights, helping organizations gain a deeper understanding of what makes an ideal candidate by analyzing feedback trends over time.
TBH helps improve employer branding and reputation. It streamlines the feedback process, improves candidate experience, and facilitates more informed hiring decisions, helping teams build stronger, more cohesive organizations.
Conclusion
The choice between written and verbal feedback presents a classic trade-off between structure and speed, between methodical assessment and authentic impression. However, modern technology has largely eliminated the need to choose between these benefits. Tools like TBH now enable recruitment teams to capture the immediacy and richness of verbal feedback while maintaining the structure and documentation benefits of written assessments.
Organizations that embrace this hybrid approach are seeing significant improvements in both decision quality and speed. By reducing administrative burdens on interviewers, these systems increase compliance with feedback protocols, ensure more comprehensive candidate evaluations, and accelerate time-to-decision metrics.
As the talent acquisition landscape continues to evolve, the ability to collect, analyze, and act upon high-quality feedback will remain a competitive advantage. Forward-thinking organizations are already moving beyond the written-versus-verbal dichotomy to implement integrated feedback systems that optimize for both quality and speed.
Table of Contents
Featured Podcast
Improve candidate experience in 7 minutes. Listen now.
FAQs
More information about this topic
Citations
- Talent Board. (2023). Candidate Experience Research Report. [Data indicates 73% of candidates wait more than a week for feedback]
- Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. (2022). Impact of Feedback Timing on Assessment Accuracy. [Study showing 31% reduction in predictive validity when feedback is delayed]
- Stanford University. (2023). Decision-Making in Hiring Processes. [23% improvement in performance prediction with verbal feedback]
- Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). (2023). Talent Acquisition Benchmarking Report. [5.4 days longer time-to-decision with written-only feedback systems]
- Deloitte. (2023). Global Talent Acquisition Trends. [42% reduction in time-to-decision with verbal feedback implementation]
- LinkedIn Talent Solutions. (2023). Candidate Experience Survey. [Companies providing prompt feedback are 4x more likely to have candidates reapply]